Said Abracadabra Biography

Tresh content gains millions of views, and its authors become heroes of the Internet. Is there a place for charity on YouTube and why the audience likes to observe how some people put experiments on others. TV raised half a million rubles for an apartment for a pensioner from the Vologda region, who went to the forest for a fallen, because her pensions are not enough for firewood.

The subscribers learned about the problem of Valentina Alexandrovna thanks to the author of the channel Alexander. After he shot a video about how his grandmother shows a donated apartment, and organized a new fee, now for repairs. Alexander is often engaged in charity work: he paid for the pensioners the purchases in the store all day, not forgetting to rent everything on the camera, rented an apartment to the homeless Said, arranged his campaign on the program “Let's get married” and makes a whole series about him.

Now Alexander is represented in the media as a video blogger who helps homeless. But more recently, he offered the same people to eat raw chicken heads and locusts. Sausages with sharp sauce, vodka and locusts for rubles - here you are a monster. I already drank three bottles. The fourth, final, ”says Alexander to his hero, homeless named Yuri. I won’t win, I say in kind, - Yuri clearly feels bad after he drank three bottles of vodka in one gulp.

If I hadn’t eaten, I would have won. Yuri still does not dare to open the fourth bottle, then Alexander adds:-Well, come on, Yorets, I believe. Experiments on the homeless are the “branded” content of the video blogger Alexander, about which it is only known that he lives in Moscow and brings up two children. Now Alexander deleted most of the trash content, although the videos can still be found on other channels.

Only the most harmless pranks remained, where the author asks the homeless for rubles to compete in eating thirty sausages with a sharp sauce of five million views or eating a kilogram of caviar two million views. I guess that the idea may seem crazy for you, but I like to do what I myself have not yet seen. Yes, and you will be interested to look at this sight, ”Alexander explains at the beginning of the video.

He further reports that a kilogram of caviar costs 45 thousand rubles, which means that it will be the most expensive experiment, and asks the audience who will like his “trick”, to like the video. The meager universe according to the Socialblade service. TV per month is from two thousand to 36 thousand dollars. Sergey Kokarev - for shows, this is the CPM indicator, according to Socialblade, Utubert earns from 0.25 to 4 USD, but we cannot know the final earnings, ”says Sergey Kokarev, director of the April Media Communications Agency.

TV, looks more realistic than 36 thousand, since Russia has a very low price for video rod. TV makes 8 integrations, respectively, income will be approximately 1.2 million rubles. But you should not confuse the revenue of the blogger with its profit, the growing channel requires investments in crops, writing scenarios, shooting, installation, etc. The idea to make money on the homeless is not new.

Their world, as it is presented on YouTube, even received a separate name - a meager universe. One of the first to make a person living on the street, the hero of the Internet, were the authors of the channel “I want to eat”. Now the channel is not available in Russia, but you can still find and watch individual videos. The whole series about the life of the homeless “One day among the homeless” is shot by the creator of the channel “Pavel Vasilievich Live”.

He comes to visit the homeless, brings a lot of alcohol, introduces and “reduces” them so that the content is even more “trash”. Pavel Vasilievich is sadly known that his homeless hero ate a living rat. The channel has not so many subscribers - a little more than 35 thousand, but this is enough to find the advertiser and earn money. The only conclusion that can be made from the number of subscribers is a lot of a wound audience on the channel.

I believe that those who want to buy advertising in such hard videos as eating a head will be minimal. Rather, these are some marginal stories, a la bookmakers or pyramids. On the complaints of users, YouTube can ban any content. Reasons for complaining nine: sexual materials; cruel or repulsive scenes; insults or manifestation of intolerance; harmful or dangerous effects drugs, suicide, arson; cruel treatment of children; propaganda of terrorism; spam; Violation of copyright or confidentiality.

Sergey recalls the scandal, which began in the year and received the name "Elsagate". YouTube for almost three years fought with pseudo -deputy content - a series of the same strange psychedelic children's videos with the number of views at 70 although there is no eating head there. It is simply not always funny, and more often tough pranks in the style of school hooliganism.

In general, according to YouTube, pornographic content is automatically prohibited, and the rest of the audience of the post -factory passes the rest, Kokarev continues.From this we can conclude that the audience is quite satisfied with the tests of homeless people in the style of "what a man is ready for the sake of money." When asked why such content is popular, Kokarev replies: for exactly the same reason why the top TV shows are popular in the spirit “Dom-2”, “Let's get married” and most of what goes to the prime time.

TV bought a pensioner Valentina Alexandrovna an apartment, the Internet instantly flew around. The reputation of a person who helps the poor and homeless is entrenched in Alexander. But is it right to call what the blogger is doing now, charity, if this primarily brings him a considerable income? New platforms, which include Utub, are built on business models and media models. You must understand that YouTube is not only media, but also a big business, and people who place videos there also play business.

They wind up likes, try to attract people with catchy headlines. They have ethics not journalists who are somehow brought up on traditions, but ethics of businessmen. If the video gives hype, likes, it means that it is suitable for YouTube. Sergei Kokarev proposes to separate the work of a blogger to create content and advertising income from charitable activities. To reproach a person that he does not give money from advertising to help those in need is how to reproach the leading first channel from some top transfer, in which they periodically also collect for something money, that he receives his salary, and does not work just like that.

Grigory Sverdlin Director of the Overnight Grigory Sverdlin, who has been engaged in the help of homeless for many years, suggests that there is an element of education and attracting attention to the problem in such rollers. Thanks to the activity of bloggers of this kind, some may learn more about real charity, at best they will begin to be interested in why people actually get into the street.

Most of all it is upset that, instead of broadcasting the respectful attitude towards people who have fallen into trouble and to whom this blogger, if he is a philanthropist, wants to help, he broadcasts the attitude towards homeless as experienced animals with his videos. It is great if one grandmother can help, but if you achieve this with such means, then this person should understand his responsibility.

He teaches a million of his subscribers that homeless people are not quite people, you can mock them like this for the sake of the fan. It must be explained that the vast majority of the homeless did not dream of such a life and did not choose such a fate. It is necessary, how for many years the “overnight” does, to show that these are different people with different fates.

This shows that the homeless can be helped, that this is not a caste of outcasts and not a sentence, but a temporary state of a person. On the one hand, in our society as a whole, a high level of aggression of all to everyone, and on the other, there are a lot of stereotypes in relation to the homeless and many are following the path of “divided”. They no longer see in homeless people.

This is sad, and you have to fight it. Only enlightenment and talk about specific people with specific fate can we fight a situation where a person is not seen in a person. Since you have a small request here. This story was told thanks to the support of readers. Even the smallest monthly donation helps the editorial office and create important materials for people. Now your help is needed more than ever.